🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.